Sunday, January 25, 2015
Timeless Figure
The "Masks of Mickey Mouse" seem to slip through time, and are reincarnated throughout multiple generations and cultures. Brockway asserts that Disney's creation seems to touch on, and embody an archetypal figure that exists within the human psyche. Somehow Mickey Mouse has grasped everyone's love and attention, and this connection does not exist solely in one generation, but multiple. Brockway falsely predicted that Mickey would lose popularity after transition into the 21st century, and while many new Disney movies hold children's attention in this modern era, Mickey Mouse still exists as the symbolic owner of the Disney corporation. Mickey Mouse was able to transition from one era to the next, and possessed a remarkable ability to play different roles that sympathized with many different types of audiences, both young and old. His magical character, existence as a mouse, and somewhat humorous stature gave Mickey Mouse an amiable and enrapturing aura. It had never crossed my mind to think if Walt Disney's little character as something bigger than just that, a character. But it seems that Mickey Mouse is the one fictional character who has held people's hearts closest for the longest time since he was drawn. I loved Mickey Mouse as a child, and I still find a connection with him today. Even as a child, I somehow knew that Mickey was related to fun I would experience at the parks. I believed that Mickey somehow owned all the different rides, and I knew it was Mickey's theme park. Disney's creation seemed to come to life in different forms that traveled with me as I grew from a toddler into a young teen, and Mickey's luster seemed untarnished. I believe that Brockway is correct. There's something special about the little mouse in the read shorts and giant ears.
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Wasko's Rant
Any aware person can see the truth behind Wasko's words in "Challenging Disney Myths," and the intelligent person would understand many of the myths she points out in her article, but this does not have to detract from the fun and love that surrounds Disney and its products. Like any story over time, details change and ordinarily simple statements turn into extreme exaggerations. This transformation is no different than the details surrounding the rise of Walt Disney the man, and I do not believe he can be criticized for the progression of his name because he possessed no knowledge of how immensely his actions would project onto the world stage. Wasko never touched on a key point that I believe to be extremely pertinent to the discussion of credit claiming, and how Disney's name arose as the predominant actor in the rise of the empire. This point is simply that Walt Disney shares the same name as his company, and thus the two would naturally be connected, and the magic and fervor that would come to be associated with Disney world would also emblazon the life of the man after whom the empire was named.
Wasko also mentions a few key irregularities between Disney's personal life and the messages the company seems to put forth to its audience. She implies that Disney is a hypocrite, and a money-making mogul who only seeks to take advantage of small portions of his life to sympathize with the greater American public, but I see this as a harsh judgement of a man who quite possibly could have wished those portions of his life played a larger role. Disney's unstable situation at home growing up could have encouraged him to want to push family ideals, also indicative of his rural sympathies, which tend to rely on family more so than city life, which can be quite individualistic.
The biggest issue I raise with Wasko is that while all of this might be factually correct, it does not mean we cannot partake in the joy that surrounds the Disney empire. For some, the disagreement with Disney's values may drive them away from anything that has the Disney label attached to it, but for many such as myself, Disney is actually extremely enjoyable. Of course Disney is a money-making institution, and how can we expect any entertainment corporation to be wholly philanthropic? Disney is an intelligent company who tries to maximize their audience, but if they bring fun in doing so, then I fail to see where the problems with Disney lie. As the Modern Age extends, our nation changes and so does Disney in its efforts to diversify its films and continue to make childhood fun and magical like it should be. Disney has shown tendencies to identify with traditional American values because that is where public opinion was oriented, and so that is where Disney made an audience. In recent years, public opinion has begun to swing and change, and so will Disney.
Wasko also mentions a few key irregularities between Disney's personal life and the messages the company seems to put forth to its audience. She implies that Disney is a hypocrite, and a money-making mogul who only seeks to take advantage of small portions of his life to sympathize with the greater American public, but I see this as a harsh judgement of a man who quite possibly could have wished those portions of his life played a larger role. Disney's unstable situation at home growing up could have encouraged him to want to push family ideals, also indicative of his rural sympathies, which tend to rely on family more so than city life, which can be quite individualistic.
The biggest issue I raise with Wasko is that while all of this might be factually correct, it does not mean we cannot partake in the joy that surrounds the Disney empire. For some, the disagreement with Disney's values may drive them away from anything that has the Disney label attached to it, but for many such as myself, Disney is actually extremely enjoyable. Of course Disney is a money-making institution, and how can we expect any entertainment corporation to be wholly philanthropic? Disney is an intelligent company who tries to maximize their audience, but if they bring fun in doing so, then I fail to see where the problems with Disney lie. As the Modern Age extends, our nation changes and so does Disney in its efforts to diversify its films and continue to make childhood fun and magical like it should be. Disney has shown tendencies to identify with traditional American values because that is where public opinion was oriented, and so that is where Disney made an audience. In recent years, public opinion has begun to swing and change, and so will Disney.
Monday, January 12, 2015
Why I chose to Enroll in Decoding Disney
Disney has been an integral part of my childhood development, from the movies I watched as young boy to the annual trips I would take to Disney with my family every year for Spring Break. My grandfather had purchased a large amount of Disney points years ago, and as Disney's value continued to rise, so did the value of my grandfather's points. With these points, he would take the whole family to Disney World every year, and the tradition has continued with my little cousins. I have traveled to Orlando over twenty times, and I know almost everything there is to know about the Disney theme park experience in Florida. I took the opportunity to enroll in this class to learn and discover more about the influences I received as a child, and to better understand the shaping mechanisms of my early development. Disney played such a giant role throughout my life, that I jumped at the opportunity to dissect and analyze something that was so important in my life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)